I want to be between the first ones to bring this news:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2105307,00.asp
!Can't believe that!
Best regards,
Fernando D. Bozzo
I want to be between the first ones to bring this news:
http://www.eweek.com/article2/0,1759,2105307,00.asp
!Can't believe that!
Best regards,
Fernando D. Bozzo
I'm hoping the author has an inside track to what's really going on. Let's let this article take on a life of it's own, regardless - it really does make a good story. Really what does MS have to loose I think they will gain more as far as peer respect and recognition if they really did open the actual core. Also, it would be a great experiment for them.
If the core were opened some key things could happen: possibly a VFP.NET version/compiler, 64-bit VFP, support for future OSs, probably would run on Linux (is that a deal breaker - dosen't MS support .NET on Linux ). Minus the paranoia, I think this would really be a win-win for everybody...
Ok, I know about Sedna and what YAG have said, may be is that I want to believe that MS will release the VFP core code without that with IP (like Rushmore).
This have some sense to me, but I've asked the autor of the article to clarify the point.
Thanks to all.
About my post, I want to say that the autor have not answered my question to clarification about this, so I think that he talked about Sedna without mentioning it explicitly.
But even with this, the open-sourcing of Sedna is great news!
Regards,
Fernando D. Bozzo